Miller Performance Millermatic

Aug 20, 2011

Hobart Handler 210 versus Millermatic

The Hobart Handler 210 may be the portable (weighing only 76.5 lb or 34.8 kg, to help you go easily from jobsite to jobsite) MIG welder which has more 210 amplifiers of welding energy to handle 3/8 inch thick mild steel and enough control for twenty-four Gauge material. It is made to handle a number of materials including mild steel, stainless, and aluminum. The simplicity of hooking up an optional direct plug-in spool gun grows the capacity from the Handler 210 for aluminum welding.

It’s enhanced magnetics and infinite wire feed speed control offers simpler fine charge of the output parameters for enhanced arc performance with less spatter, producing a better bead appearance and fewer cleanup.

If you need to do aluminum works, you’ve most likely heard that TIG is the best choice for your. Not this time around &ndash Handler 210 welds aluminum in addition to steel. You need to do get a little of black but that simply baby wipes off because the magnesium within the aluminum oxidizes.

Ergonomics &amplifier Safety. Built-in contactor for simple me is also a great safety feature making wire electric “cold” if not welding. You’ll have quick access to polarity move includes storage holes for spare tips. Dual groove drive comes allow it to be simple to switch between .023/.025-Inch (.6 mm) and .030 to .035-Inch (.8 &ndash .9 mm) wire. And self-resetting thermal overload and motor protection prevents getting too hot.

Comparison. The Hobart 210 and other alike Millermatic counterparts (Millermatic 180, 210, 211) &nbsphave virtually exactly the same output, duty cycle plus they make use of the same drive systems. The feeling and weld quality ought to be virtually identical. What exactly would be the variations?
The Millermatic is really a dual current machine that may work on 230 or 115 volts. Which means it might be simple to go to some buddy’s house and weld lighter materials by inserting right into a standard 115 volt circuit (20 amplifier service). However to be able to go along with you, it will to become light. Millermatic doesn’t fall under that category as well as costs as much as two occasions just as much.
Millermatic offers adjustable current as much as 7 positions, that might appear like a large plus, however experts sometimes consider infinitely adjustable current control to not be a benefit within the drawn on current models. Drawn on current models are simpler to create and obtain the arc called in.

The Millermatic is going to be of the slightly better quality since Burns now is the owner of Hobart and sells the Hobart like a less expensive option to the Millermatic line. They do not usually skimp where it counts though. Such things as the drive mechanism will in all probability be identical.

Hobart offers more current for welding aluminum, so if you’re uncertain to date but are intending to work mostly with aluminum choose Handler 210. Spool gun coming with Hobart may be the Burns Spoolmate 3035 equivalent.

About the Author

This article has been written by producers of Easy Metal Works – product resource and review website dedicated to Hobart welding and cutting equipement, and other metal works products. Hobart Welders tools are known for excellent quality and reliability. However, with so many product models that are offered today, it is hard to choose which one is the most appropriate for your needs and budget.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • Blogosphere News
  • Diigo
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • IndianPad
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkedIn
  • MisterWong
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Socialogs
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
Posted by | Categories: Welding Gear |

Share with others

No Responses so far | Have Your Say!

Leave a Feedback

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>